RUDNICKI v. COX
372 U.S. 226 (1963)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

RUDNICKI v. COX, 372 U.S. 226 (1963)

372 U.S. 226

RUDNICKI v. COX ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
MASSACHUSETTS. No. 706.
Decided February 18, 1963.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed.

Page 372 U.S. 226, 227


BOARD CTY. COMM'RS, JEFFERSON v. CITY & CTY., DENVER, <a href="/cases/federal/us/372/226/case.html">372 U.S. 226</a> (1963) 372 U.S. 226 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

BOARD CTY. COMM'RS, JEFFERSON v. CITY & CTY., DENVER, 372 U.S. 226 (1963)

372 U.S. 226

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, COLORADO, ET AL. v.
CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO. No. 635.
Decided February 18, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 150 Colo. 198, 372 P.2d 152.

Charles Ginsberg for appellants.

Robert S. Wham, Richard P. Matsch, Charles S. Rhyne, Brice W. Rhyne and Alfred J. Tighe, Jr. for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE WHITE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.




Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.