CANNATA v. CITY OF NEW YORK - 371 U.S. 4 (1962)


U.S. Supreme Court

CANNATA v. CITY OF NEW YORK, 371 U.S. 4 (1962)

371 U.S. 4

CANNATA ET AL. v. CITY OF NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 163.
Decided October 8, 1962.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 11 N. Y. 2d 210, 182 N. E. 2d 395.

Raphael H. Weissman for appellants.

Leo A. Larkin and Pauline K. Berger for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


WAXMAN v. VIRGINIA, <a href="/cases/federal/us/371/4/case.html">371 U.S. 4</a> (1962) 371 U.S. 4 (1962) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

WAXMAN v. VIRGINIA, 371 U.S. 4 (1962)

371 U.S. 4

WAXMAN ET AL. v. VIRGINIA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA.
No. 274.
Decided October 8, 1962.

203 Va. 257, 123 S. E. 2d 381, reversed.

Morris P. Glushien for appellants.

Robert Y. Button, Attorney General of Virginia, and Kenneth C. Patty and D. Gardiner Tyler, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The judgments are reversed. San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon, 359 U.S. 236.

MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 371 U.S. 4, 5



Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.