ABLEMAN v. CITY OF CEDAR RAPIDS
368 U.S. 3 (1961)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

ABLEMAN v. CITY OF CEDAR RAPIDS, 368 U.S. 3 (1961)

368 U.S. 3

ABLEMAN ET AL. v. CITY OF CEDAR RAPIDS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA.
No. 246.
Decided October 9, 1961.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 252 Iowa 948, 108 N. W. 2d 253.

Ernest F. Pence and Roy A. Golden for appellants.

C. W. Garberson and William M. Dallas for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 368 U.S. 3, 4


SECURITY-1ST NAT. BK., LOS ANGELES v. FRANCHISE TAX BD., <a href="/cases/federal/us/368/3/case.html">368 U.S. 3</a> (1961) 368 U.S. 3 (1961) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

SECURITY-1ST NAT. BK., LOS ANGELES v. FRANCHISE TAX BD., 368 U.S. 3 (1961)

368 U.S. 3

SECURITY-FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LOS ANGELES ET AL. v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD
OF CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 122.
Decided October 9, 1961.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 55 Cal. 2d 407, 359 P.2d 625.

Pierce Works, Warren M. Christopher, Hugo A. Steinmeyer, Richard E. Sherwood and Brenton L. Metzler for appellants.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, James E. Sabine, Assistant Attorney General, and Ernest P. Goodman, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.