BARGAINTOWN v. WHITMAN
367 U.S. 903 (1961)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

BARGAINTOWN v. WHITMAN, 367 U.S. 903 (1961)

367 U.S. 903

BARGAINTOWN, U.S. A., INC., ET AL. v. WHITMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY
OF LEBANON COUNTY PA., ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF

PENNSYLVANIA.

No. 76.
Decided June 19, 1961.

___ F. Supp. ___, affirmed.

David G. Bress and Leonard Braman for appellants.

Anne X. Alpern, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and Harry J. Rubin for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed. McGowan v. Maryland, 366 U.S. 420, and Two Guys from Harrison-Allentown, Inc., v. McGinley, 366 U.S. 582.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.


BECK v. MAINE, <a href="/cases/federal/us/367/903/case.html">367 U.S. 903</a> (1961) 367 U.S. 903 (1961) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

BECK v. MAINE, 367 U.S. 903 (1961)

367 U.S. 903

BECK v. MAINE.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE.
No. 899.
Decided June 19, 1961.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 156 Me. 403, 165 A. 2d 433.

A. Raymond Rogers for appellant.

Frank E. Hancock, Attorney General of Maine, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 367 U.S. 903, 904




Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.