JERROLD ELECTRONICS CORP. v. UNITED STATES
365 U.S. 567 (1961)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

JERROLD ELECTRONICS CORP. v. UNITED STATES, 365 U.S. 567 (1961)

365 U.S. 567

JERROLD ELECTRONICS CORP. ET AL. v. UNITED STATES.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
PENNSYLVANIA. No. 631.
Decided March 20, 1961.

187 F. Supp. 545, affirmed.

Israel Packel for appellants.

Solicitor General Cox, Acting Assistant Attorney General Kirkpatrick and Richard A. Solomon for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Points 1 and 3, Northern Pacific R. Co. v. United States, 356 U.S. 1; International Salt Co. v. United States, 332 U.S. 392. Points 2 and 6, United States v. W. T. Grant Co., 345 U.S. 629, 633. Point 4, Schine Theatres v. United States, 334 U.S. 110, 119.


LOUISIANA v. WALKER, <a href="/cases/federal/us/365/567/case.html">365 U.S. 567</a> (1961) 365 U.S. 567 (1961) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

LOUISIANA v. WALKER, 365 U.S. 567 (1961)

365 U.S. 567

LOUISIANA EX REL. ALLEN v. WALKER, WARDEN.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA.
No. 655, Misc.
Decided March 20, 1961.

Appeal dismissed because notice thereof was not filed within statutory period.

Jack N. Rogers and Robert H. Reiter for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for the reason that the notice thereof was not filed within the time provided by law.

Page 365 U.S. 567, 568




Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.