NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BD. v. CELANESE CORP., AMERICA, 365 U.S. 297 (1961)

Syllabus

U.S. Supreme Court

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BD. v. CELANESE CORP., AMERICA, 365 U.S. 297 (1961) 365 U.S. 297

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. CELANESE CORPORATION OF AMERICA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 382.
Decided February 20, 1961.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 279 F.2d 204.

Solicitor General Rankin, Stuart Rothman, Dominick L. Manoli and Norton Come for petitioner.

Gerard D. Reilly and Joseph C. Wells for respondent.

PER CURIAM.


Opinions

U.S. Supreme Court

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BD. v. CELANESE CORP., AMERICA, 365 U.S. 297 (1961) 365 U.S. 297 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. CELANESE CORPORATION OF AMERICA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 382.
Decided February 20, 1961.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 279 F.2d 204.

Solicitor General Rankin, Stuart Rothman, Dominick L. Manoli and Norton Come for petitioner.

Gerard D. Reilly and Joseph C. Wells for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for consideration in the light of Labor Board v. Mattison Machine Works, ante, p. 123.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS and MR. JUSTICE STEWART are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied.


365 U.S. 297 (1961) 365 U.S. 297 (1961) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

GATES v. CALIFORNIA, 365 U.S. 297 (1961) 365 U.S. 297 GATES v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DEPARTMENT OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA,
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. No. 528, Misc.
Decided February 20, 1961.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 365 U.S. 297, 298