OHIO v. SHANNON
364 U.S. 337 (1960)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

OHIO v. SHANNON, 364 U.S. 337 (1960)

364 U.S. 337

OHIO EX REL. KING v. SHANNON, PRESIDING JUDGE, MUNICIPAL COURT OF
CINCINNATI, OHIO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. No. 363.
Decided November 7, 1960.

Appeal dismissed because the judgment below is based on a non-federal ground adequate to support it.

Reported below: 170 Ohio St. 393, 165 N. E. 2d 642.

Allen Brown for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal herein is dismissed for the reason that the judgment of the Supreme Court of the State of Ohio, sought here to be reviewed, is based upon a nonfederal ground adequate to support it.


ARMCO STEEL CORP. v. MICHIGAN, <a href="/cases/federal/us/364/337/case.html">364 U.S. 337</a> (1960) 364 U.S. 337 (1960) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

ARMCO STEEL CORP. v. MICHIGAN, 364 U.S. 337 (1960)

364 U.S. 337

ARMCO STEEL CORP. v. MICHIGAN ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN.
No. 387.
Decided November 7, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 359 Mich. 430, 102 N. W. 2d 552.

Paul R. Trigg, Jr. and Robert D. Dunwoodie for appellant.

Paul L. Adams, Attorney General of Michigan, Samuel J. Torina, Solicitor General, and William D. Dexter, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 364 U.S. 337, 338

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.