RUMMEL v. MUSGRAVE
364 U.S. 293 (1960)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

RUMMEL v. MUSGRAVE, 364 U.S. 293 (1960)

364 U.S. 293

RUMMEL ET AL. v. MUSGRAVE ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO.
No. 303.
Decided October 17, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 142 Colo. 249, 350 P.2d 825.

Fred M. Winner for appellants.

Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General of Colorado, Frank E. Hickey, Deputy Attorney General, and John W. Patterson, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


PICCOTT v. FLORIDA, <a href="/cases/federal/us/364/293/case.html">364 U.S. 293</a> (1960) 364 U.S. 293 (1960) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

PICCOTT v. FLORIDA, 364 U.S. 293 (1960)

364 U.S. 293

PICCOTT v. FLORIDA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
No. 112, Misc.
Decided October 17, 1960.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 116 So.2d 626.

Tobias Simon for petitioner.

Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, and George R. Georgieff, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 364 U.S. 293, 294

Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.