Telegraphers v. Chicago & N.W. R. Co. - 362 U.S. 330 (1960)


U.S. Supreme Court

Telegraphers v. Chicago & N.W. R. Co., 362 U.S. 330 (1960)

Order of Railroad Telegraphers v.

Chicago & North Western Railway Co.

No. 100

Argued March 1-2, 1960

Decided April 18, 1960

362 U.S. 330

Syllabus

An interstate railroad applied to the public utility commissions of four States for permission to abolish or consolidate many of its little-used stations. The labor union which was the bargaining agent of the station agents and telegraphers whose jobs would be abolished notified the railroad under § 6 of the Railway Labor Act of a desire to negotiate for an amendment to its current bargaining agreement which would prevent the railroad from abolishing any position without the union's consent, and it threatened to strike if the railroad refused to negotiate about the amendment. The railroad sued in a Federal District Court to enjoin such a strike.

Held: the case involves or grows out of a "labor dispute" within the meaning of the Norris-LaGuardia Act, and the District Court was without jurisdiction to enjoin the strike permanently. Pp. 362 U. S. 331-343.

(a) This controversy was a "labor dispute," as defined in § 13(c) of the Norris-LaGuardia Act. Pp. 362 U. S. 335-338.

(b) The strike here involved could not be enjoined on the theory that it was unlawful for the union to seek to bargain about the consolidation or abandonment of railroad stations, which are within the control of state regulatory commissions. Pp. 362 U. S. 338-341.

(c) The dispute here involved was not a "minor" one which the Railway Labor Act requires to be heard by the National Railroad Adjustment Board. P. 362 U. S. 341.

264 F.2d 254 reversed.

Page 362 U. S. 331



Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.