GAIR v. PECK, 361 U.S. 374 (1960)

Syllabus

U.S. Supreme Court

GAIR v. PECK, 361 U.S. 374 (1960) 361 U.S. 374

GAIR ET AL. v. PECK ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK COUNTY.
No. 544.
Decided January 25, 1960.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 6 N.Y.2d 97, 160 N.E.2d 43.

Howard Hilton Spellman for appellants.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, and James O. Moore, Jr. for appellees.

PER CURIAM.


Opinions

U.S. Supreme Court

GAIR v. PECK, 361 U.S. 374 (1960) 361 U.S. 374 GAIR ET AL. v. PECK ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK COUNTY.
No. 544.
Decided January 25, 1960.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 6 N.Y.2d 97, 160 N.E.2d 43.

Howard Hilton Spellman for appellants.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, and James O. Moore, Jr. for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


361 U.S. 374 (1960) 361 U.S. 374 (1960) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

TAYLOR v. TAYLOR, 361 U.S. 374 (1960) 361 U.S. 374 TAYLOR v. TAYLOR.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS.
No. 552.
Decided January 25, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 185 Kan. 324, 342 P.2d 190.

F. L. Hagaman for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 361 U.S. 374, 375