MAGNET COVE BARIUM CORP. v. UNITED STATES, 361 U.S. 32 (1959)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
MAGNET COVE BARIUM CORP. v. UNITED STATES, 361 U.S. 32 (1959) 361 U.S. 32MAGNET COVE BARIUM CORP. v. UNITED
STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN
DISTRICT OF
TEXAS. No. 296.
Decided October 19, 1959.
175 F. Supp. 473, affirmed.
Frank A. Leffingwell for appellant.
Solicitor General Rankin, Acting Assistant Attorney General Bicks, Richard A. Solomon, Robert W. Ginnane and Francis A. Silver for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, and Eldon Martin for the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. et al., appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
TEXAS. No. 296.
Decided October 19, 1959.
175 F. Supp. 473, affirmed. Frank A. Leffingwell for appellant. Solicitor General Rankin, Acting Assistant Attorney General Bicks, Richard A. Solomon, Robert W. Ginnane and Francis A. Silver for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, and Eldon Martin for the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. et al., appellees. PER CURIAM. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. Page 361 U.S. 32, 33
U.S. Supreme Court
MAGNET COVE BARIUM CORP. v. UNITED STATES, 361 U.S. 32 (1959) 361 U.S. 32 MAGNET COVE BARIUM CORP. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
TEXAS. No. 296.
Decided October 19, 1959.
175 F. Supp. 473, affirmed. Frank A. Leffingwell for appellant. Solicitor General Rankin, Acting Assistant Attorney General Bicks, Richard A. Solomon, Robert W. Ginnane and Francis A. Silver for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, and Eldon Martin for the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. et al., appellees. PER CURIAM. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. Page 361 U.S. 32, 33
Search This Case
