DEVRIES v. BAUMGARTNER'S ELECTRIC CONSTRUCTION CO., 359 U.S. 498 (1959)
U.S. Supreme Court
DEVRIES v. BAUMGARTNER'S ELECTRIC CONSTRUCTION CO., 359 U.S. 498 (1959) 359 U.S. 498DEVRIES ET AL. v. BAUMGARTNER'S
ELECTRIC CONSTRUCTION CO.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH
DAKOTA.
No. 551.
Decided May 18, 1959.
Certiorari granted and judgment reversed.
Reported below: 77 S. D. ___, 91 N.W.2d 663.
Louis Sherman and Joseph M. Stone for petitioners.
Melvin T. Woods for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is reversed. San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon, ante, p. 236.
MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, MR. JUSTICE WHITTAKER, and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent for the reasons set forth in the concurring opinion in San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon, ante, pp. 236, 249.
359 U.S. 498 (1959) 359 U.S. 498 (1959) ">
U.S. Supreme Court
ANDERSON v. CITY OF CEDAR RAPIDS, 359 U.S. 498 (1959) 359 U.S. 498ANDERSON ET AL. v. CITY OF CEDAR RAPIDS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA.
No. 786.
Decided May 18, 1959.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 250 Iowa ___, 93 N.W.2d 216.
Ernest F. Pence and Roy A. Golden for appellants.
William M. Dallas for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
DEVRIES v. BAUMGARTNER'S ELECTRIC CONSTRUCTION CO., 359 U.S. 498 (1959) 359 U.S. 498 DEVRIES ET AL. v. BAUMGARTNER'S ELECTRIC CONSTRUCTION CO.ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH DAKOTA.
No. 551.
Decided May 18, 1959.
Certiorari granted and judgment reversed. Reported below: 77 S. D. ___, 91 N.W.2d 663. Louis Sherman and Joseph M. Stone for petitioners. Melvin T. Woods for respondent. PER CURIAM. The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is reversed. San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon, ante, p. 236. MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, MR. JUSTICE WHITTAKER, and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent for the reasons set forth in the concurring opinion in San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon, ante, pp. 236, 249.
359 U.S. 498 (1959) 359 U.S. 498 (1959) ">
U.S. Supreme Court
ANDERSON v. CITY OF CEDAR RAPIDS, 359 U.S. 498 (1959) 359 U.S. 498 ANDERSON ET AL. v. CITY OF CEDAR RAPIDS.APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA.
No. 786.
Decided May 18, 1959.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Reported below: 250 Iowa ___, 93 N.W.2d 216. Ernest F. Pence and Roy A. Golden for appellants. William M. Dallas for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Page 359 U.S. 498, 499
