LOS ANGELES v. PUB. UTIL. COMM'N.Annotate this Case
359 U.S. 119 (1959)
U.S. Supreme Court
LOS ANGELES v. PUB. UTIL. COMM'N., 359 U.S. 119 (1959)359 U.S. 119
CITY OF LOS ANGELES ET AL. v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF
CALIFORNIA ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 656.
Decided March 23, 1959.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Roger Arnebergh, Alan G. Campbell and Walhfred Jacobson for appellants.
J. Thomason Phelps for appellees. Arthur T. George, Francis N. Marshall, John Robert Jones, Alvin H. Pelavin and Warren A. Palmer for the Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. et al., appellees.
Briefs of amici curiae urging reversal were filed by John C. Banks, Walter J. Mattison, John C. Melaniphy, J. Elliott Drinard, Claude V. Jones, Charles S. Rhyne and J. Parker Connor for the Member Municipalities of the National Institute of Municipal Law Officers; by Archie L. Walters, M. Tellefson, John H. Lauten, Henry McClernan and Everett M. Glenn for the Cities of Azusa et al., municipal corporations of the State of California; and by A. L. Wirin and Fred Okrand for the American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California.
The motion of the Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company et al. to be added as parties appellee is granted. The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.