GROCHOWIAK v. PENNSYLVANIA
358 U.S. 47 (1958)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

GROCHOWIAK v. PENNSYLVANIA, 358 U.S. 47 (1958)

358 U.S. 47

GROCHOWIAK v. PENNSYLVANIA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT.
No. 166.
Decided October 13, 1958.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 184 Pa. Super. 522, 136 A. 2d 145.

John W. Keller and Mitchell Salem Fisher for appellant.

Thomas D. McBride, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, Frank P. Lawley, Jr. and Harry J. Rubin, Deputy Attorneys General, and George C. Eppinger for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.


MARANZE v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, <a href="/cases/federal/us/358/47/case.html">358 U.S. 47</a> (1958) 358 U.S. 47 (1958) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

MARANZE v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, 358 U.S. 47 (1958)

358 U.S. 47

MARANZE v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 144, Misc.
Decided October 13, 1958.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 167 Ohio St. 323, 148 N. E. 2d 229.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 358 U.S. 47, 48

Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.