F. & M. SCHAEFER BREW. v. GEROSA, COMPTROLLER, NEW YORK
358 U.S. 282 (1959)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

F. & M. SCHAEFER BREW. v. GEROSA, COMPTROLLER, NEW YORK, 358 U.S. 282 (1959)

358 U.S. 282

F. & M. SCHAEFER BREWING CO. v. GEROSA, COMPTROLLER OF THE CITY OF NEW
YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. No. 526.
Decided January 12, 1959.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 4 N. Y. 2d 423, 151 N. E. 2d 845.

Russell D. Morrill and Francis L. Casey for appellant.

Stanley Buchsbaum and Morris L. Heath for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


McDANIEL v. CALIFORNIA, <a href="/cases/federal/us/358/282/case.html">358 U.S. 282</a> (1959) 358 U.S. 282 (1959) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

McDANIEL v. CALIFORNIA, 358 U.S. 282 (1959)

358 U.S. 282

McDANIEL v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE
DISTRICT. No. 283, Misc.
Decided January 12, 1959.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 157 Cal. App. 2d 492, 321 P.2d 497.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 358 U.S. 282, 283




Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.