Caritativo v. California
357 U.S. 549 (1958)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Caritativo v. California, 357 U.S. 549 (1958)

Caritativo v. California

No. 561

Argued May 21, 1958

Decided June 30, 1958*

357 U.S. 549

Syllabus

California law forbids the execution of an insane person, but leaves to the sole judgment of the prison warden the initiation of proceedings to determine the sanity of a condemned criminal in his custody. If the warden "has good reason to believe" that a condemned prisoner has become insane, he must so advise the district attorney, who must institute court proceeding leading to a determination of the prisoner's sanity by a jury. But, if the warden does not take the first step, no judge, court, or officer, other than the Governor, can suspend the execution of a death sentence. Petitioners had been convicted of murder and sentenced to death, and their convictions had been affirmed by the State Supreme Court. Subsequently, the warden of the prison where they were confined determined that there was no reason to believe them insane, and refused to institute proceedings to determine their sanity. The State Supreme Court denied writs of habeas corpus to review the warden's determinations.

Held: the judgments are affirmed on the authority of Solesbee v. Balkcom,339 U. S. 9.

Affirmed.

Page 357 U. S. 550

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.