STATE OF WISCONSIN v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, 355 U.S. 944 (1958)

Syllabus

U.S. Supreme Court

STATE OF WISCONSIN v. STATE OF ILLINOIS , 355 U.S. 944 (1958)

355 U.S. 944

The STATE OF WISCONSIN et al., complainants,
v.
The STATE OF ILLINOIS and Sanitary District of Chicago et al.
No. 2, Original.

The STATE OF MICHIGAN, complainant,
v.
The STATE OF ILLINOIS and Sanitary District of Chicago et al.
No. 3, Original.

STATE OF NEW YORK, complainant,
v.
STATE OF ILLINOIS and Sanitary District of Chicago et al.
No. 4, Original.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 3, 1958


Opinions

U.S. Supreme Court

STATE OF WISCONSIN v. STATE OF ILLINOIS , 355 U.S. 944 (1958)  355 U.S. 944

The STATE OF WISCONSIN et al., complainants,
v.
The STATE OF ILLINOIS and Sanitary District of Chicago et al.
No. 2, Original.

The STATE OF MICHIGAN, complainant,
v.
The STATE OF ILLINOIS and Sanitary District of Chicago et al.
No. 3, Original.

STATE OF NEW YORK, complainant,
v.
STATE OF ILLINOIS and Sanitary District of Chicago et al.
No. 4, Original.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 3, 1958

Messrs. Stewart G. Honeck, Atty. Gen., and Ray Tulane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for State of Wisconsin; Miles Lord, Atty. Gen., and Melvin J. Peterson, Deputy Atty. Gen., for State of Minnesota; William Saxbe, Atty. Gen., and Robert E. Boyd, Asst. Atty. Gen., for State of Ohio; Thomas D. McBride, Atty Gen., and Lois G. Forer, Deputy Atty. Gen., for State of Pennsylvania; Thomas M. Kavanagh, Atty. Gen., Samuel J. Torina, Sol. Gen., and Nicholas V.

Page 355 U.S. 944 , 945

Olds, Asst. Atty. Gen., for State of Michigan; and Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen., and John R. Davison, Sol. Gen., for State of New York, applicants-complainants.

Messrs. Latham Castle, Atty. Gen., of Illinois, William C. Wines, Asst. Atty. Gen., Russell W. Root, Lawrence J. Fenlon, Joseph B. Fleming and Thomas M. Thomas, for defendants.

Mr. Frederick M. Rowe, for defendants State of Illinois and Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago.

Solicitor General Rankin, Messrs. John F. Davis and David R. Warner, for the United States, as amicus curiae.

The application and motion herein are denied, with leave to renew the application and motion with allegations made more definite and certain as a basis for the relief sought.