ROEL v. NEW YORK COUNTY LAWYERS ASSOCIATION
355 U.S. 604 (1958)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

ROEL v. NEW YORK COUNTY LAWYERS ASSOCIATION, 355 U.S. 604 (1958)

355 U.S. 604

ROEL v. NEW YORK COUNTY LAWYERS ASSOCIATION.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 627.
Decided March 3, 1958.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 3 N. Y. 2d 224, 144 N. E. 2d 24.

Homer H. Breland for appellant.

Abraham N. Davis for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


BARNES v. NATIONAL BROADCASTING CO., INC., <a href="/cases/federal/us/355/604/case.html">355 U.S. 604</a> (1958) 355 U.S. 604 (1958) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

BARNES v. NATIONAL BROADCASTING CO., INC., 355 U.S. 604 (1958)

355 U.S. 604

BARNES v. NATIONAL BROADCASTING CO., INC., ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
ILLINOIS. No. 202, Misc.
Decided March 3, 1958.

Appeal dismissed.

Appellant pro se.

Howard Ellis, Perry S. Patterson and Don H. Reuben for the National Broadcasting Co., and Louis M. Mantynband and Le Roy R. Krein for the Columbia Broadcasting Co., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed.

Page 355 U.S. 604, 605




Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.