TEXAS EX REL. PAN AMER. PROD. v. CITY OF TEXAS CITY
355 U.S. 603 (1958)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

TEXAS EX REL. PAN AMER. PROD. v. CITY OF TEXAS CITY, 355 U.S. 603 (1958)

355 U.S. 603

TEXAS EX REL. PAN AMERICAN PRODUCTION CO. ET AL. v. CITY OF TEXAS CITY,
TEXAS, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS. No. 574.
Decided March 3, 1958.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 157 Tex. ___, 303 S. W. 2d 780.

Francis G. Coates for appellants.

Dow H. Heard for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


OOSTERHOUDT v. MORGAN, <a href="/cases/federal/us/355/603/case.html">355 U.S. 603</a> (1958) 355 U.S. 603 (1958) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

OOSTERHOUDT v. MORGAN, 355 U.S. 603 (1958)

355 U.S. 603

OOSTERHOUDT v. MORGAN ET AL., CONSTITUTING THE FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF
ACCOUNTANCY.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. No. 623.
Decided March 3, 1958.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 96 So.2d 139.

Edward McCarthy and Elliott Adams for appellant.

Charles E. Pledger, Jr., Justin L. Edgerton and L. William Graham for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 355 U.S. 603, 604




Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.