LINCOLN BUILDING ASSOCIATES v. BARR
355 U.S. 12 (1957)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

LINCOLN BUILDING ASSOCIATES v. BARR, 355 U.S. 12 (1957)

355 U.S. 12

LINCOLN BUILDING ASSOCIATES v. BARR ET AL., DOING BUSINESS AS SWIM FOR
HEALTH ASSOCIATION.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. No. 128.
Decided October 14, 1957.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 1 N. Y. 2d 413, 135 N. E. 2d 801.

Max Freund for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


COTTRELL v. PAWCATUCK COMPANY, <a href="/cases/federal/us/355/12/case.html">355 U.S. 12</a> (1957) 355 U.S. 12 (1957) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

COTTRELL v. PAWCATUCK COMPANY, 355 U.S. 12 (1957)

355 U.S. 12

COTTRELL v. PAWCATUCK COMPANY (FORMERLY C. B. COTTRELL & SONS CO.) ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE.
No. 316.
Decided October 14, 1957.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: ___ Del. ___, 128 A. 2d 225.

Edward J. Ennis for appellant.

Henry M. Canby for the Pawcatuck Company et al. and David F. Anderson for the Harris-Seybold Company et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 355 U.S. 12, 13




Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.