NATIONWIDE TRAILER RENTAL SYSTEM v. UNITED STATES
355 U.S. 10 (1957)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

NATIONWIDE TRAILER RENTAL SYSTEM v. UNITED STATES, 355 U.S. 10 (1957)

355 U.S. 10

NATIONWIDE TRAILER RENTAL SYSTEM, INC., ET AL. v. UNITED STATES.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS.
No. 114.
Decided October 14, 1957.

Judgment affirmed.

Thurman Arnold, Reed Miller and William T. Stephens for appellants.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen and Charles H. Weston for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.


WHITE v. WASHINGTON., <a href="/cases/federal/us/355/10/case.html">355 U.S. 10</a> (1957) 355 U.S. 10 (1957) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

WHITE v. WASHINGTON., 355 U.S. 10 (1957)

355 U.S. 10

WHITE ET AL., DOING BUSINESS AS KITSAP AUTOMATIC DISPENSER CO., ET AL.
v. WASHINGTON.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON. No. 184.
Decided October 14, 1957.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 49 Wash. 2d 716, 306 P.2d 230.

S. Harold Shefelman for appellants.

John J. O'Connell, Attorney General of Washington, and Keith Grim and Fred C. Dorsey, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 355 U.S. 10, 11




Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.