Bank of America v. Parnell
352 U.S. 29 (1956)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Bank of America v. Parnell, 352 U.S. 29 (1956)

Bank of America National Trust & Savings Association v. Parnell

Argued October 18, 1956

Decided November 13, 1956*

352 U.S. 29

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

Alleging diversity of citizenship, petitioner, a bank in California, sued in a Federal District Court in Pennsylvania to recover the value of certain bonds alleged to have been converted in Pennsylvania. They were bearer bonds of the Home Owners' Loan Corporation, guaranteed by the United States, maturing in 1952 but called for redemption in 1944. They disappeared from petitioner's possession in 1944, and respondent Parnell, acting for one Rocco, presented them in 1948 to respondent bank in Pennsylvania, which collected the proceeds and paid them to Parnell, who paid them to Rocco. On the theory that state law governed, the District Court instructed the jury that respondents had the burden of showing that they took the bonds in good faith, without knowledge or notice of defect in title. Verdicts and judgments were for petitioner, but the Court of Appeals reversed on the ground that, under federal law, the bonds were not "overdue" when presented to respondent bank, and petitioner had the burden of showing notice and lack of good faith on the part of respondents.

Held: the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed, and the case is remanded to that Court for further proceedings. Pp. 352 U. S. 30-34.

(a) This litigation is purely between private parties, it does not touch the rights and duties of the United States, and the issues of burden of proof and good faith are governed by the law of Pennsylvania, where the transactions took place. Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States,318 U. S. 363, distinguished. Pp. 352 U. S. 32-34.

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.