East Texas Motor Freight Lines v. Frozen Food Express
351 U.S. 49 (1956)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

East Texas Motor Freight Lines v. Frozen Food Express, 351 U.S. 49 (1956)

East Texas Motor Freight Lines v. Frozen Food Express

Argued March 7, 1956

Decided April 23, 1956*

351 U.S. 49

Syllabus

On complaint of three motor common carriers under § 204 (c) of the Interstate Commerce Act, the Commission ordered Frozen Food Express, another motor common carrier, to cease and desist from transporting in interstate commerce without a certificate of convenience and necessity fresh and frozen dressed poultry, which it found not to be within the exemption under § 203(b)(6) of the Act of "agricultural . . . commodities (not including manufactured products thereof)." Frozen Food Express sued in a Federal District Court to set aside the order.

Held: fresh and frozen dressed poultry is an "agricultural" commodity within the meaning of § 203(b)(6), and not a "manufactured" product thereof, and the District Court properly set aside the Commission's order. Pp. 351 U. S. 50-54.

128 F.Supp. 374 affirmed.

Page 351 U. S. 50

Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.