Commissioner v. Southwest Exploration Co.
350 U.S. 308 (1956)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Commissioner v. Southwest Exploration Co., 350 U.S. 308 (1956)

Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Southwest Exploration Co.

Argued January 23-24, 1956

Decided February 27, 1956*

350 U.S. 308

Syllabus

A drilling company contracted to develop certain oil deposits lying off the coast of California by slant drilling from sites located on the property of adjacent upland owners. State law permitted such offshore oil to be extracted only by drilling from upland drill sites or filled land, and no filled lands were available. The drilling company agreed to pay the upland owners 24 1/2% of the net profits for the use of their land.

Held: under the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, the upland owners, not the drilling company, were entitled to take the statutory depletion allowance on this share of the profits. Pp. 350 U. S. 309-317.

(a) The right to depletion is determined by whether or not the taxpayer has an economic interest, i.e., an interest in the oil in place and income derived solely from production. Pp. 350 U. S. 313-315.

(b) Since the uplands were essential to any production from the offshore oil deposits, agreement of the upland owners to let their land be used for drilling in return for a share of the net profits gave them the requisite economic interest. Pp. 350 U. S. 315-316.

(c) Their income was dependent entirely on production, and the value of their interest decreased with each barrel of oil produced. P. 350 U. S. 316.

(d) Where, as here, a party essential to the drilling for and extraction of oil has made an indispensable contribution of the use of real property adjacent to the oil deposits in return for a share in the net profits from the production of oil, that party has an economic interest which entitles him to depletion on the income thus received. Pp. 350 U. S. 316-317.

220 F.2d 58 reversed. 132 Ct.Cl. 427, 132 F.Supp. 718, affirmed.

Page 350 U. S. 309

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.