Franklin Nat'l Bank v. New York
347 U.S. 373 (1954)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Franklin Nat'l Bank v. New York, 347 U.S. 373 (1954)

Franklin National Bank of Franklin Square v. New York

No. 427

Argued March 9-10, 1954

Decided April 5, 1954

347 U.S. 373

Syllabus

Insofar as it forbids national banks to use the word "saving" or "savings" in their business or advertising, the New York statute here involved is invalid, because it conflicts with federal laws expressly authorizing national banks to receive savings deposits and to exercise incidental powers. Pp. 347 U. S. 374-379.

(a) The provision of § 24 of the Federal Reserve Act authorizing national banks to "continue hereafter as heretofore to receive time and savings deposits" is declaratory of the right of national banks to enter into or remain in that type of business, and their authority to receive savings deposits is not limited or qualified by the expression "continue hereafter as heretofore." P. 347 U. S. 377.

(b) Nor are national banks precluded from advertising for the savings deposits which they are expressly authorized to accept. Pp. 347 U. S. 377-378.

(c) Congress did not intend to make this phase of national banking subject to local restrictions because of the special significance attached to the word "savings" in some states. P. 347 U. S. 378.

305 N.Y. 453, 113 N.E.2d 796, reversed.

Page 347 U. S. 374

Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.