United States v. Fatio's Heirs - 33 U.S. 492 (1834)
U.S. Supreme Court
United States v. Fatio's Heirs, 33 U.S. 8 Pet. 492 492 (1834)
United States v. Fatio's Heirs
33 U.S. (8 Pet.) 492
APPEAL FROM THE SUPERIOR
COURT OF EAST FLORIDA
Confirmation of a Spanish grant of land in Florida, to Philip P. Fatio.
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE MARSHALL delivered the opinion of the Court.
This was a petition presented in pursuance of the Act of Congress of 23 May, 1828, providing for the adjudication of private land claims in Florida. The petitioners state that their claim is founded upon a grant for 10,000 acres of land made by the governor of the province, then under the dominion of the King of Great Britain, to their ancestor Philip P. Fatio, deceased, and that by the stipulations of the treaty between their Britannic and catholic majesties, dated 3 September, 1783, provision was made in the fifth article that the British proprietors should be allowed a specified period to sell their lands in the Provinces of East and West Florida, which were by that treaty ceded to Spain.
It was further provided that where the value of the possessions was such, that "they should not be able to dispose of them within the said term, then His Catholic Majesty shall grant them a prolongation proportioned to that end."
Provision was also made by Spain in favor of such of the British proprietors as remained in the province and became Spanish subjects. The ancestor of the petitioners remained and took the oath of allegiance, and the lands were surveyed and confirmed to him by the Spanish authorities.
The title was presented to the commissioners, and a report made in favor of the grant, and by the third section of the act of Congress, approved May 26, 1830, it was provided
"That all claims derived from the former British government,
contained in the reports of the Commissioners of East Florida, who did not avail themselves of the treaty between Spain and England, signed at Versailles on 20 January, 1783, by leaving said province, but who remained in the same and became Spanish subjects, and whose titles were approved by the Spanish authorities, and have been recommended by the commissioners, or the register and receiver acting as such, be and the same are hereby confirmed."
The treaty referred to in the above recited act was evidently intended to be that of 3 September, 1783, and the article is the fifth of that treaty, and not the third, as alleged in the petition.
In addition to the above laws and treaties, the petitioners have proved a possession, which constitutes a title by prescription, by the laws of Spain.
It is therefore considered, adjudged and decreed that the decree of the Superior Court of East Florida be
This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record from the Superior Court for the Eastern District of Florida, and was argued by counsel, on consideration whereof it is ordered, adjudged and decreed by this Court that the decree of the said superior court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed in all respects.