Jones v. Opelika
319 U.S. 103 (1943)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Jones v. Opelika, 319 U.S. 103 (1943)

Jones v. Opelika

No. 280, October Term, 1941

Reargued March 10, 11, 1943

Decided May 3, 1943

319 U.S. 103

CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA

Syllabus

Upon rehearing, 318 U.S. 796, the judgments heretofore entered in these cases, 316 U. S. 316 U.S. 584, affirming the judgments of the state courts, are vacated, and the judgments of the state courts are reversed. P. 319 U. S. 104.

242 Ala. 549, 7 So.2d 503, reversed.

202 Ark. 614, 151 S.W.2d 1000, reversed.

58 Ariz. 144, 118 P.2d 97, reversed.

Page 319 U. S. 104

PER CURIAM (announced by MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS).

The judgments in these cases were affirmed at the October Term, 1941. 316 U. S. 316 U.S. 584. Because the issues in all three cases were of the same character as those brought before us in other cases by applications for certiorari at the present term, we ordered a reargument and heard these cases together with Murdock v. Pennsylvania, post, p. 319 U. S. 105. For the reasons stated in the opinion of the Court in the Murdock case and in the dissenting opinions filed in the present cases after the argument last term, the Court is of opinion that the judgment in each case should be reversed. The judgments of this Court heretofore entered in these cases are therefore vacated, and the judgments of the state courts are reversed.

So ordered.

For dissenting opinions of MR. JUSTICE REED, and MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER, see post, pp. 319 U. S. 117-140.

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.