Callaghan v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.
297 U.S. 464 (1936)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Callaghan v. Reconstruction Finance Corp., 297 U.S. 464 (1936)

Callaghan v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.

No. 539

Argued February 13, 14, 1936

Decided March 2, 1936*

297 U.S. 464

Syllabus

1. Where a bankruptcy proceeding is superseded by a reorganization proceeding under § 77B of the Bankruptcy Act, the allowances to trustees for services in the bankruptcy proceeding are nevertheless limited by § 48 of the Act. P. 297 U. S. 466.

2. This limitation is not removed by § 77B(i), which authorizes the judge in the reorganization proceeding to order payment of "such reasonable administrative expenses and allowances in the prior proceeding as may be fixed by the court appointing" the prior trustee. P. 297 U. S. 467.

3. Trustees in bankruptcy are officers of a court, and, like public officers generally, must show clear warrant of law before compensation will be owing to them for the performance of their public duties. P. 297 U. S. 468.

4. In recognition of the policy of Congress that proceedings in bankruptcy and under § 77B be economically administered, the limitations upon expenses prescribed by §§ 40 and 48 have been strictly construed, even when the compensation allowed in the particular case was materially less than that which otherwise might have been considered reasonable. P. 297 U. S. 468.

5. A reorganization under § 77B is not a confirmation of a composition, and a referee in a proceeding in bankruptcy which was superseded by a reorganization proceeding is not entitled to have his

Page 297 U. S. 465

compensation computed according to § 40(a) as in the case of a confirmation of a composition. P. 297 U. S. 470.

6. Section 40(c) of the Bankruptcy Act, relating to the allocation of fees allowed under § 40(a) in the event that the reference is revoked or the case is specially referred, held inapplicable. P. 297 U. S. 471.

79 F.2d 187 affirmed.

Certiorari, 296 U. S. 570, to review a judgment modifying and reversing orders of the District Court.

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.