Pobreslo v. Joseph M. Boyd Co.
287 U.S. 518 (1933)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Pobreslo v. Joseph M. Boyd Co., 287 U.S. 518 (1933)

Pobreslo v. Joseph M. Boyd Co.

No. 171

Argued December 13, 1932

Decided January 9, 1933

287 U.S. 518

Syllabus

1. Voluntary assignments for the benefit of creditors are not inconsistent with the purposes of the federal Bankruptcy Act, though

Page 287 U. S. 519

subject to be set aside under it by timely petition of creditors. P. 287 U. S. 526.

2. Statutory provisions in Wisconsin regulating voluntary assignments for the ratable benefit of all creditors of the assignor, and forbidding that any creditor gain priority by attachment or garnishment, but not providing for discharge of the assignor or requiring his release by creditors who would participate in the distribution, held not in conflict with the Bankruptcy Act. International Shoe Co. v. Pinkus,278 U. S. 261, distinguished. Pp. 287 U. S. 523-525.

210 Wis. 20, 242 N.W. 725, affirmed.

Appeal from a judgment upholding an assignment for the benefit of creditors and directing the dismissal of a garnishment proceeding brought by a nonassenting creditor.

Page 287 U. S. 521

Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.