Lucas v. North Texas Lumber Co.
281 U.S. 11 (1930)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Lucas v. North Texas Lumber Co., 281 U.S. 11 (1930)

Lucas v. North Texas Lumber Company

No. 92

Argued January 15, 16, 1930

Decided February 24, 1930

281 U.S. 11

CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Syllabus

An option offered by one corporation to another to buy lands at a specified price was accepted late in 1916 by a notice from the vendee, in which it declared itself ready to close the transaction and pay the price as soon as the transfer papers were prepared by the vendor. The vendor did not prepare the papers, transfer or tender title or possession, or demand or receive the purchase price, until early in 1917, when the transaction was closed. Held that, as unconditional liability of the vendee was not created in 1916, the vendor, though it kept its accounts on the accrual basis, was not

Page 281 U. S. 12

entitled under § 13(d) of the 1916 Revenue Act to enter the purchase price as income of that year and to make return and have the tax computed on that basis, which clearly did not reject 1916 income. P. 281 U. S. 13.

30 F.2d 680 reversed.

Certiorari, 280 U.S. 538, to review a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which reversed an order of the Board of Tax Appeals, 7 B.T.A. 1193, sustaining a finding of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

MR. JUSTICE BUTLER delivered the opinion of the Court.

The respondent, a Texas corporation, for some time prior to 1917 was engaged in operating a sawmill, selling lumber, and buying and selling timber lands. December 27, 1916, it gave to the Southern Pine Company a ten-day option to purchase its timber lands for a specified price. The latter was solvent and able to make the purchase. On the same day, title was examined and found satisfactory to the Pine Company. It arranged for the money needed, and, December 30, 1916, notified respondent that it would exercise the option. On that day, respondent ceased operations and withdrew all employees from the land. January 5, 1917, the papers which were required to effect the transfer were delivered, the purchase price was paid, and the transaction was finally closed.

Page 281 U. S. 13

Respondent kept its accounts on the accrual basis, and treated the profits derived from the sale as income in 1916. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue determined that the gain had been realized in, and was taxable for, 1917. The Board of Tax Appeals sustained his finding. 7 B.T.A. 1193. The circuit court of appeals reversed the Board. 30 F.2d 680.

The gain derived from this sale was taxable income. [Footnote 1] If attributed to 1916, the tax would be much less than if made in 1917. [Footnote 2] Section 13(d) of the Revenue Act of 1916 provided that a corporation keeping its accounts upon any basis other than that of actual receipts and disbursements, unless such other basis failed clearly to reflect income, might make return upon the basis upon which its accounts were kept, and have the tax computed upon the income so returned. [Footnote 3]

An executory contract of sale was created by the option and notice, December 30, 1916. In the notice, the purchaser declared itself ready to close the transaction and pay the purchase price "as soon as the papers were prepared." Respondent did not prepare the papers necessary to effect the transfer or make tender of title or possession or demand the purchase price in 1916. The title and right of possession remained in it until the transaction was closed. Consequently, unconditional liability of vendee for the purchase price was not created in that year. Gober v. Hart, 36 Tex. 139. Cf. United States v. Anderson,269 U. S. 422, 269 U. S. 441; American National Co. v. United States,274 U. S. 99. The entry of the purchase price in respondent's accounts as income in that year was not warranted. Respondent was not entitled

Page 281 U. S. 14

to make return or have the tax computed on that basis, as clearly it did not reflect 1916 income.

Judgment reversed.

[Footnote 1]

§ 2(a), Act of September 8, 1916, 39 Stat. 756, 757. § 1200, Act of October 3, 1917, 40 Stat. 300, 329.

[Footnote 2]

§ 10, Act of September 8, 1916, 39 Stat. 756, 765. § 201, Act of October 3, 1917, 40 Stat. 300, 303.

[Footnote 3]

39 Stat. 756, 771.

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.