Ribnik v. McBride
277 U.S. 350 (1928)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Ribnik v. McBride, 277 U.S. 350 (1928)

Ribnik v. McBride

No. 569

Argued April 26, 27, 1928

Decided May 28, 1928

277 U.S. 350

ERROR TO THE COURT OF ERRORS

AND APPEALS OF NEW JERSEY

1. The business of an employment agent is not one "affected with a public interest," and, under the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, a state cannot fix the fees which such an agent may charge for his services. P. 277 U. S. 355.

2. The power to require a license for, and to regulate the conduct of, a business is distinct from the power to fix prices. P. 277 U. S. 358.

3. The fact that a business lends itself peculiarly to the practice of fraud, extortion, and discrimination may be ground for regulation, but not for price-fixing. P. 277 U. S. 368.

Page 277 U. S. 351

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.