Trusler v. Crooks
269 U.S. 475 (1926)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Trusler v. Crooks, 269 U.S. 475 (1926)

Trusler v. Crooks

No. 188

Argued November 17, 1925

Decided January 11, 1926

269 U.S. 475

Syllabus

Section 3 of the "Future Trading Act," purporting to impose a tax of 20 cents per bushel upon all privileges or options for contracts of purchase or sale of grain, known to the trade as "privileges," "bids," "offers," "puts and calls," "indemnities," or "ups and downs," is unconstitutional. Its purpose is not to raise revenue, but to inhibit, by a penalty, the transactions referred to, as part of the plan set up by the Act for regulating grain exchanges under guise of the federal taxing power, which was adjudged unconstitutional in Hill v. Wallace,259 U. S. 44. P. 269 U. S. 479.

300 F. 996 reversed.

Error to a judgment of the District Court for the defendant in an action brought to recover money paid under protest as a stamp tax.

Page 269 U. S. 479

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.