Hixon v. Oakes - 265 U.S. 254 (1924)
- Syllabus
- Case
U.S. Supreme Court
Hixon v. Oakes, 265 U.S. 254 (1924)
Hixon v. Oakes
No. 420
Argued April 24, 1924
Decided May 26, 1924
265 U.S. 254
Syllabus
A city ordinance forbidding the filling of prescriptions calling for more than eight ounces of alcoholic liquor manifestly does not infringe any right of the pharmacist granted by the Eighteenth
Amendment or the National Prohibition Act and protected by the Fourteenth Amendment.
Writ of error to review, 61 Cal.App. 200, dismissed.
Error to a judgment of the District Court of Appeal of California, remanding the plaintiff in error in a habeas corpus proceeding.
Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.
