Randall v. Board of CommissionersAnnotate this Case
261 U.S. 252 (1923)
U.S. Supreme Court
Randall v. Board of Commissioners, 261 U.S. 252 (1923)
Randall v. Board of Commissioners
of Tippecanoe County, Indiana
Argued January 25, 1923
Decided February 19, 1923
261 U.S. 252
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
OF THE STATE OF INDIANA
A writ of error to the highest court of a state must be dismissed when the judgment is one of an. intermediate court which the highest court has declined to review for want of jurisdiction. Writ of error to review 131 N.E. 776 dismissed.
Memorandum opinion by MR. JUSTICE SUTHERLAND.
This is a writ of error to the Supreme Court of Indiana when, clearly it should have been to the state appellate court.
The action was brought in the Superior Court for Tippecanoe County. A demurrer to the complaint was sustained. An appeal was allowed to the supreme court, but that court, of its own motion, entered an order transferring the cause to the appellate court for want of jurisdiction. The Appellate Court thereupon took the case, received the briefs of counsel, heard oral arguments, and affirmed the judgment of the trial court. A petition for rehearing was submitted and denied. Plaintiffs in error then applied to the supreme court for an order to vacate its former order of transfer or, in the alternative, for a writ of error coram nobis, which the supreme court denied.
It therefore appears that the supreme court refused to take the case on appeal for want of jurisdiction, and the judgment of the highest court of the state in which a decision
in the suit could be had, Judicial Code § 237, is that of the appellate court to which the writ should have been directed.
The writ of error must therefore be dismissed on the authority of Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Hughes,203 U. S. 505; Lane v. Wallace, 131 U.S. Appendix, CCXIX; Norfolk & Suburban Turnpike Co. v. Virginia,225 U. S. 264, 225 U. S. 269; Second National Bank v. First National Bank,242 U. S. 600; Prudential Ins. Co. v. Cheek,259 U. S. 530.
Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.