American Mills Co. v. American Surety Co.
260 U.S. 360 (1922)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

American Mills Co. v. American Surety Co., 260 U.S. 360 (1922)

American Mills Co. v. American Surety Company

No. 118

Argued November 24, 1922

Decided December 11, 1922

260 U.S. 360

Syllabus

1. In a suit to cancel a written guaranty for fraud, the defense that the plaintiff has an adequate remedy at law by defending actions brought by the defendant on the guaranty is waived by the defendant where, without insisting upon it, as he might, he introduces proof, under a counterclaim for the amount of the guaranty, putting the instrument in evidence. P. 260 U. S. 363.

2. The provision of Equity Rule 30 that the answer must state any counterclaim arising out of the transaction which is the subject matter of the suit applies only to equitable, not to legal, claims. P. 260 U. S. 363.

273 F. 67, affirmed.

Certiorari to a decree of the circuit court of appeals affirming a decree of the district court which cancelled a written guaranty for fraud.

Page 260 U. S. 361

Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.