Exporters v. Butterworth-Judson Co.
258 U.S. 365 (1922)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Exporters v. Butterworth-Judson Co., 258 U.S. 365 (1922)

Exporters of Manufacturers' Products v. Butterworth-Judson Co.

No. 390

Argued March 14, 1922

Decided April 10, 1922

258 U.S. 365

Syllabus

After expiration of the term of the district court at which final judgment was entered and after expiration of an extension of the term provided by general rule, but before a day to which the parties,

Page 258 U. S. 366

after such expirations, stipulated the term should be extended for the purpose, a bill of exceptions was proposed to and settled and signed by the judge. Held that the consent gave no jurisdiction, and the bill was unlawful. P. 258 U. S. 368.

Questions certified by the court below under Jud.Code § 239.

Page 258 U. S. 367

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.