Evans v. National Bank of SavannahAnnotate this Case
251 U.S. 108 (1919)
U.S. Supreme Court
Evans v. National Bank of Savannah, 251 U.S. 108 (1919)
Evans v. National Bank of Savannah
Argued November 11, 12, 1919
Decided December 8, 1919
251 U.S. 108
Whether a transaction by a national bank is usurious, and the penalties therefor, must be ascertained from the National Banking Act. P. 251 U. S. 109.
That act adopts the usury laws of the states only insofar as they severally fix the rate of interest. P. 251 U. S. 111.
Under the National Banking Act, which expressly empowers national banks to discount commercial paper and permits them to
"take, receive, reserve, and charge on any loan or discount made . . . interest at the rate allowed by the laws of the state . . . where the bank is located, and no more,"
such banks, in discounting short-time notes in the ordinary course of business, may retain an advance charge at the highest rate allowed for interest by the state law, even though such advance taking would be usurious under the state law in the cases to which it applies. P. 251 U. S. 112.
To discount, ex v termini, implies reservation of interest in advance. P. 251 U. S. 114.
21 Ga.App. 35 affirmed.
The case is stated in the opinion.
Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.