Devereaux v. MarrAnnotate this Case
25 U.S. 212
U.S. Supreme Court
Devereaux v. Marr, 25 U.S. 12 Wheat. 212 212 (1827)
Devereaux v. Marr
25 U.S. (12 Wheat.) 212
ON DIVISION OF OPINION AMONG THE JUDGES
OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF WEST TENNESSEE
This Court cannot take jurisdiction of a question on which the opinions of the judges of the circuit court are opposed where the division of opinions arises upon some proceeding subsequent to the decision of the cause in that court.
In this case the judges of the Circuit Court of West Tennessee, after a judgment had been rendered in that court,
divided in opinion upon the question as to the amount of the security bond to be given by the party applying for a writ of error, whether the amount of the bond ought to be sufficient to cover the whole debt, or only for the costs and increased damages on the party failing to prosecute his writ of error with effect. Whereupon the division of opinions was certified to this Court under the 6th section of the Judiciary Act of 29 April, 1802, ch. 291.
Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.