Union Fish Co. v. Erickson
248 U.S. 308 (1919)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Union Fish Co. v. Erickson, 248 U.S. 308 (1919)

Union Fish Co. v. Erickson

No. 76

Submitted November 22, 1918

Decided January 7, 1919

248 U.S. 308

Syllabus

By a contract made orally in California, respondent was engaged to go to Alaska and there for one year to serve as master of petitioner's vessel, mainly upon the sea. The respondent libeled the vessel in the district court in California for breach of the contract. Held that the contract was maritime, and that the California statute of frauds requiring a writing for agreements not to be performed within a year was therefore inapplicable in defense. P. 248 U. S. 312.

235 F. 385 affirmed.

The case is stated in the opinion.

Page 248 U. S. 311

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.