King v. Putnam Investment Co. - 248 U.S. 23 (1918)
- Syllabus
- Case
U.S. Supreme Court
King v. Putnam Investment Co., 248 U.S. 23 (1918)
King v. Putnam Investment Company
No. 10
Submitted November 7, 1918
Decided November 18, 1918
248 U.S. 23
Syllabus
The contention that a contract of agency to sell real estate was void because federal lands, under homestead entry, were included presents no federal question where the state court found they were not included and the record supports the finding.
Writ of error to review 96 Kan. 109 dismissed.
The case is stated in the opinion.
Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.
