Fidelity & Columbia Trust Co. v. Louisville
245 U.S. 54 (1917)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Fidelity & Columbia Trust Co. v. Louisville, 245 U.S. 54 (1917)

Fidelity & Columbia Trust Company v. City of Louisville

No. 424

Argued October 16, 17, 1917

Decided November 5, 1917

245 U.S. 54

Syllabus

A person domiciled in Kentucky carried on a business in Missouri and deposited in bank in the latter state moneys derived from the business, but not used in it, and belonging absolutely to him. The resulting credits -- ordinary bank accounts not represented by certificates and subject to his order only -- were included by Kentucky authorities in assessing his taxes in that state. Held that the tax, whether considered as a tax on property or as a tax on the individual measured by property, was within the power of the state imposing it. A state court's decision does not deprive the complaining party of the equal protection of the laws merely because it departs from decisions made by the court in earlier cases.

168 Ky. 71, 171 Ky. 509, 172 Ky. 451, affirmed.

The case is stated in the opinion.

Page 245 U. S. 57

Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.