Bay v. Merrill & Ring Logging Co.
243 U.S. 40 (1917)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Bay v. Merrill & Ring Logging Co., 243 U.S. 40 (1917)

Bay v. Merrill & Ring Logging Company

No. 165

Argued January 30, 31, 1917

Decided March 6, 1917

243 U.S. 40

Syllabus

Upon a state of facts not substantially different from those presented in McCluskey v. Marysville & Northern Railway Co., ante,243 U. S. 36, held that the defendant in error, in hauling its logs from its own timberlands over its own railroad to tidewater (origin, destination, and transit all being in the same state) for sale to others who subsequently

Page 243 U. S. 41

disposed of them or their manufactured products partly in other states, was not engaged in interstate or foreign commerce, and that the injuries suffered by the plaintiff while loading logs upon one of defendant's cars were therefore not remediable under the federal Employers' Liability Act.

220 F. 295 affirmed.

The case is stated in the opinion.

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.