LINCOLN v. POWER, 241 U.S. 651 (1916)

Syllabus

U.S. Supreme Court

LINCOLN v. POWER , 241 U.S. 651 (1916)

241 U.S. 651

IGNATIUS TIMOTHY TRIBICH LINCOLN, Appellant,
v.
JAMES M. POWER, Marshal, etc.
No. 793.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 1, 1916

Per Curiam:

Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of (1) Re Oteiza y Cortes, 136 U.S. 330, 334, 34 S. L. ed. 464, 466, 10 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1031, 8 Am. Crim. Rep. 241; Ornelas v. Ruiz, 161 U.S. 502, 508, 40 S. L. ed. 787, 789, 16 Sup. Ct. Rep. 689;


Opinions

U.S. Supreme Court

LINCOLN v. POWER , 241 U.S. 651 (1916)  241 U.S. 651

IGNATIUS TIMOTHY TRIBICH LINCOLN, Appellant,
v.
JAMES M. POWER, Marshal, etc.
No. 793.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 1, 1916

Per Curiam:

Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of (1) Re Oteiza y Cortes, 136 U.S. 330, 334, 34 S. L. ed. 464, 466, 10 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1031, 8 Am. Crim. Rep. 241; Ornelas v. Ruiz, 161 U.S. 502, 508, 40 S. L. ed. 787, 789, 16 Sup. Ct. Rep. 689;

Page 241 U.S. 651, 652

Bryant v. United States, 167 U.S. 104, 105, 42 S. L. ed. 94, 95, 17 Sup. Ct. Rep. 744; Terlinden v. Ames, 184 U.S. 270, 278, 46 S. L. ed. 534, 541, 22 Sup. Ct. Rep. 484, 12 Am. Crim. Rep. 424; Elias v. Ramirez, 215 U.S. 398, 406, 407 S., 54 L. Ed. 253, 256, 257, 30 Sup. Ct. Rep. 131; McNamara v. Henkel, 226 U.S. 520, 523, 57 S. L. ed. 330, 332, 33 Sup. Ct. Rep. 146; (2) David Kaufman & Sons Co. v. Smith, 216 U.S. 610, 54 L. Ed. 636, 30 Sup. Ct. Rep. 419; Toop v. Ulysses Land Co. 237 U.S. 580, 59 L. Ed. 1127, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 739; Manila Invest. Co. v. Trammell, 239 U.S. 31, 60 L. ed . --, 36 Sup. Ct. Rep. 12.

Mr. Addison S. Pratt for appellant.

Mr. Charles Fox for appellee.