GLASS v. WOODMAN
241 U.S. 646

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

GLASS v. WOODMAN , 241 U.S. 646 (1916)

241 U.S. 646

DAVID H. GLASS, Appellant,
v.
ALFRED H. WOODMAN1 et al.
No. 721.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 20, 1916

Messrs. W. F. Guthrie and Emmet H. Gamble for appellant.

Messrs. John S. Leahy, Walter H. Saunders, and Irvin V. Barth for appellees.

Per Curiam:

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Bagley v. General Fire Extinguisher Co. 212 U.S. 477, 53 L. ed. 605, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 341; Omaha Electric Light & P. Co. v. Omaha, 230 U.S. 123, 57 L. ed. 1419, 33 Sup. Ct. Rep. 974; St. Anthony Church v. Pennsylvania R. Co. 237 U.S. 575-577, 59 L. ed. 1119-1123, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 729; (2) St. Louis, K. C. & C. R. Co. v. Wabash R. Co. 217 U.S. 247, 250, 54 S. L. ed. 752, 754, 30 Sup. Ct. Rep. 510; Railroad Commission v. Worthington, 225 U.S. 101, 104, 56 S. L. ed. 1004, 1006, 32 Sup. Ct. Rep. 653; Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U.S. 561, 568, 56 S. L. ed. 1205, 1210, 32 Sup. Ct. Rep. 704.

The petition for Writ of Certiorari is denied.

Footnotes

Footnote 1 Death of Alfred H. Woodman suggested, and appearance of James P. Newell, public administrator of the city of St. Louis, and administrator of the estate of Alfred H. Woodman, deceased, filed and entered on March 13, 1916.[ Glass v. Woodman 241 U.S. 646 (1916) ]




Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.