PURCELL v. QUAKER REALTY CO.
239 U.S. 635 (1916)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

PURCELL v. QUAKER REALTY CO., 239 U.S. 635 (1916)

70 S. Ct. 283 239 U.S. 635 60 L. Ed. 479

ROBERT M. PURCELL et al., Plaintiffs in Error,
v.
QUAKER REALTY COMPANY, LIMITED.
No. 152.

Supreme Court of the United States

January 10, 1916

Mr. E. Howard McCaleb for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. William Winans Wall for defendants in error.

Per Curiam:

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Castillo v. McConnico, 168 U.S. 674, 42 L. ed. 622, 18 Sup. Ct. Rep. 229; De Bearn v. Safe Deposit & T. Co. 233 U.S. 24, 34, 58 S. L. ed. 833, 837, 34 Sup. Ct. Rep. 584; McDonald v. Oregon R. & Nav. Co. 233 U.S. 665, 669, 670 S., 58 L. ed. 1145, 1148, 1149, 34 Sup. Ct. Rep. 772; (2) Ross v. Oregon, 227 U.S. 150, 161, 57 S. L. ed. 458, 463, 33 Sup. Ct. Rep. 220, Ann. Cas. 1914C, 224; Moore-Mansfield Constr. Co. v. Electrical Installation Co. 234 U.S. 619, 624, 58 S. L. ed. 1503, 1505, 34 Sup. Ct. Rep. 941; Willoughby v. Chicago, cago, 235 U.S. 45, 59 L. ed. 123, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 23; Cleveland & P. R. Co. v. Cleveland, 235 U.S. 50, 59 L. ed. 127, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 21.[ Purcell v. Quaker Realty Co. 239 U.S. 635 (1916) ]


Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.