Detroit Steel Cooperage Co. v. Sistersville Brewing Co.
233 U.S. 712 (1914)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Detroit Steel Cooperage Co. v. Sistersville Brewing Co., 233 U.S. 712 (1914)

Detroit Steel Cooperage Company v.

Sistersville Brewing Company

No. 368

Argued May 8, 1914

Decided May 25, 1914

233 U.S. 712

Syllabus

The common law knows no objection to what is commonly called a conditional sale.

Chattels, such as tanks, furnished for a brewery under a contract of conditional sale duly recorded, although indispensable as part of the completed structure and attached to the real estate as between the mortgagor and the mortgagee, are not so attached to the realty as to become a part thereof and subject to the lien of a prior mortgage as between the vendor of the tanks and the mortgagee, if, as in this case, they can be removed without the physical disintegration of the building. Holt v. Henley,232 U. S. 637.

An owner of a chattel may lose title thereto without his consent by its incorporation into a structure in such manner that its removal would destroy the structure.

The mere knowledge that a chattel, delivered under a contract of conditional sale, will be attached to the freehold is of no importance, except as against innocent purchasers for value before the sale is recorded.

195 F. 447, 1023, reversed.

The facts, which involve claims of the vendor and the holder of a mortgage bond to certain tanks and fixtures delivered to the owner of brewery under a conditional sale, are stated in the opinion.

Page 233 U. S. 715

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.