Schuyler v. Littlefield
232 U.S. 707 (1914)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Schuyler v. Littlefield, 232 U.S. 707 (1914)

Schuyler v. Littlefield

No. 213

Argued January 29, 1914

Decided March 23, 1914

232 U.S. 707

Syllabus

Where one has deposited trust funds in his individual bank account and the mingled fund is at any time wholly depleted, the trust fund is thereby dissipated and cannot be treated as reappearing in sums subsequently deposited to the credit of the same account.

One seeking to charge a fund in the hands of a trustee for the benefit of all creditors as being the proceeds of his property and therefore a special trust fund for him, has the burden of proof, and if he is unable

Page 232 U. S. 708

to identify the fund as representing the proceeds of his property, his claim must fail, as all doubt must be resolved in favor of the trustee, who represents all creditors.

193 F. 24 affirmed.

The facts, which involve determining the relative rights to the bank balance of a bankrupt stockbroker, of the trustee and of a customer whose securities the bankrupt had sold, are stated in the opinion.

Page 232 U. S. 710

Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.