Santa Fe Central Ry. Co. v. Friday
232 U.S. 694 (1914)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Santa Fe Central Ry. Co. v. Friday, 232 U.S. 694 (1914)

Santa Fe Central Ry. Co. v. Friday

No. 230

Submitted March 5, 1914

Decided March 23, 1914

232 U.S. 694

Syllabus

A statute of a territory cannot withdraw from the courts established by the United States authority expressly conferred upon them by Congress by the Organic Act and other statute. The City of Panama,101 U. S. 453.

The District Court of the United States for New Mexico has jurisdiction of a case arising under the Employers' Liability Act of 1906.

This Court will not decide against the local understanding as expressed by the decisions of the Supreme Court of a Territory in construing a jurisdictional statute affecting a matter of local concern unless those decisions are clearly wrong. Phoenix Ry. Co. v. Landis,231 U. S. 57.

16 N.M. 434 affirmed.

The facts, which involve the jurisdiction of the courts of a territory of the United States over actions brought under the Employers' Liability Act of 1906, are stated in the opinion.

Page 232 U. S. 698

Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.