Piza Hermanos v. Caldentry
231 U.S. 690 (1914)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Piza Hermanos v. Caldentry, 231 U.S. 690 (1914)

Piza Hermanos v. Caldentry

No. 134

Submitted December 15, 1913

Decided January 5, 1914

231 U.S. 690

Syllabus

Where the principle on which the amount recovered is based is admitted, this Court will not go behind well warranted findings of fact in regard to the question of amount.

Where it appears that there may have been an error in computing the

Page 231 U. S. 691

amount of the recovery, this Court can affirm the judgment without prejudice to reopening the account for the single purpose of correcting such error if the lower court so permits.

The facts, which involve the construction of a contract of employment, are stated in the opinion.

Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.