Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. Harlan & Hollingsworth
228 U.S. 567 (1913)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. Harlan & Hollingsworth, 228 U.S. 567 (1913)

Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. Harlan & Hollingsworth

No. 530

Submitted April 28, 1913

Decided May 12, 1913

228 U.S. 567

Syllabus

As the Act of August 13, 1894, relative to contractors' bonds prior to the amendment of February 24, 1905, contained no provision as to jurisdiction of courts in which suits could be brought on such bonds, the Circuit Court of the district in which the bondsman, if a surety company, has its principal office, had jurisdiction under the act

Page 228 U. S. 568

regulating surety companies of August 13, 1894, and this jurisdiction extended to suits on bonds executed prior to the amendatory act for materials furnished after the passage of that act.

The Act of February 24, 1905, amending the Act of August 13, 1894, and requiring that all suits on a contractor's bond be brought in the district in which the contract was to be performed, had merely a prospective operation, and no retroactive effect. Davidson Marble Co. v. Gibson,213 U. S. 10.

The facts, which involve the jurisdiction of the circuit court of actions brought on contractors' bonds under the Act of August 13, 1894, and the construction of the act amendatory thereof of February 24, 1905, are stated in the opinion.

Page 228 U. S. 570

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.